Errattic

Home About Us All Fuctasia_(NSFW) Games Gay+ Health/Food Movies Music Musings Photos_(NSFW) TV Wisps Preferences

Home Page > Current Page


Top Tags

Anal
Ass
Best
Bi
Big Cock
Blonde
Celebrity
Comedy
Cum
Dance
Disease
Education
Environment
Family
Food
Fuctasia
Funny
Gay
Giant Cock
Government
Hairy
History
Hot Swatch
Identity
Latin
Legal
Lesbian
Mama Wrecks
Mask
Mature
Medical
Mental Health
Music
Nature
Parental Burden
Parody
Piercings
Politics
Portrait
Relationships
Religion
Restaurant
RIP
Science
Sci-Fi
Sex
Shopping
Sissy
Stand-Up
Teacher
Thanks
Thighmaster
Trans
TV Gay Swatch
Vegan
What Men Want
World


Login

Create Profile
Login


This site does not claim credit for images, videos, or music, except where noted.


©2026 Errattic.com

Restricted to Adults
This site does not claim credit for images, videos, or music, except where noted.


Welcome to Errattic! We encourage you to customize the type of information you see here by clicking the Preferences link on the top of this page.

 

Embryos Don’t Have Hearts 

 

Within the last few years, six U.S. states — Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio, Georgia, Iowa, and North Dakota — have passed so-called “heartbeat bills,” a term that’s become shorthand for a proposed ban on abortions beginning six weeks into a pregnancy, or the point at which a “fetal heartbeat” can be detected. Four more states have similar bills pending. Anti-abortion activists have doubled down on “heartbeat” messaging — in a recent news release regarding the ACLU’s legal challenge of the Ohio bill, the state’s leading anti-abortion group, Ohio Right to Life, used the term eight times in 300 words.

But obstetricians say the term “fetal heartbeat” is misleading, and that this scientific misunderstanding, among countless others, may contribute to negative public opinion toward abortion.

The Cut

Tags: Abortion, Argument, Choices, Misrepresentation, Overpopulation, Science

Filed under: Health/Food

24-May-2019


Share

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google+ Share via Email