Errattic
Home About Us All Fuctasia_(NSFW) Games Gay+ Health/Food Movies Music Musings Photos_(NSFW) TV Wisps Preferences
Home Page > Current Page
Top Tags
2010sAbuse
Action
Animate
Art
Asian
Ass
Big Balls
Big Cock
Black
Blonde
Bulge
Business
Camp
Celebrity
Choices
Cocksuck
CockTease
Comedy
Compilation
Cum
Daddy Squish
Dance
Director's Slice
Drama
Entertainment
Environment
Exhibit
Fantasy
Feet
Food
Fuck
Funny
Gay
Gear
Giant Cock
Gif
Glasses
Hairy
Hard
Health
History
Hole Puncher
Horror
Hot Swatch
Interracial
Jock
Latin
Legs
LGBTQ
Lifestyle
Mass Appeal
Massle
Masturbate
Mat
Mental Health
Muscle
Music
Nature
Outside
Parody
Piercings
Pillows
Plenti-fil
Political
Portrait
Pose
Relationships
Respect
Romance
Safety
Science
Selfie
Sex
Silly
Social Media
Special Talent
Sports
Squirt
Squishy
Star Watt
Study
Support
Suspense
Sweet
Tats
Tits
Toned
Travel
Treatment
Tribute
T-shirt
Undies
Video
Violence
Voyeur
Weird
Wet
World
Youth
Login
Create ProfileLogin
This site does not claim credit for images, videos, or music, except where noted.
All Posts Tagged as 'Treatment'
Welcome to Errattic! We encourage you to customize the type of information you see here by clicking the Preferences link on the top of this page.
Bill Maher Finally Says What So Many Think but Are Too Afraid to Say
The people who CAN say something SHOULD say something. I’m old – I have lived a pretty good life so far, all things considered. I now must fight for a better world for my daughter who is coming of age into this psychotic one. She is a creative, brilliant, compassionate, caring person who, like so many of you, has a right to stretch her legs and find some kind of honesty in both the art she receives and the art she makes. But right now, she, like so many others, are being reduced to the ways they can be punished, each and every day for something they do “wrong.” Orwell would call it “wrong think” and we truly are in the era of children spies where we are all constantly being monitored for anything we might say or do to get ourselves shamed publicly or have our platforms removed.
Your choices are to be silent to save yourself, to stand up against it and destroy yourself, or the worst of all of them, to pander to it. Don’t pander to it. If you don’t go along with it, stay silent. Spare yourselves the shame of the future looking back at you and your having to live with having pandered to a force you know in your bones is wrong.
Your choices are to be silent to save yourself, to stand up against it and destroy yourself, or the worst of all of them, to pander to it. Don’t pander to it. If you don’t go along with it, stay silent. Spare yourselves the shame of the future looking back at you and your having to live with having pandered to a force you know in your bones is wrong.
Bill Maher Finally Says What So Many Think but Are Too Afraid to Say
Pic. The electoral winners think we elected gods. 28-Feb-2021
Help! My Aunt Says It’s a “Choice” to Be Offended by Racial Slurs.
Q. Aunt wants to “get over” racial slurs: My aunt (father’s sister) and I have had a fairly acrimonious relationship since I was in my teens, mostly because of her dislike of my mother. Fast forward to Christmas of this year, when I texted my aunt and her husband to thank them for some cookies they sent me. We started talking again, exchanging memes and discussing our shared love of photography, in what I had hoped was a fresh start. Talk turned to politics eventually, because we both believed our politics aligned somewhat—me more as a leftist, and her a liberal.
However, when I mentioned that I was happy to see white people experience consequences when they used slurs such as the N-word, she said it was a “choice” to be offended by slurs like that, and how people needed to get over it. She even spelled it out. I was totally bewildered. We are both white women. I told her it was inappropriate and racist for her to write or say that word. She continued to use it, saying she should be able to because it was “just a word.” I went on to provide her with multiple sources about why it was offensive and racist. She then said how I was “looking for reasons to have contempt for her” and how she and “the family” have never understood why I’ve always hated her. This went on and on until I eventually stopped responding. However, she’s texted me every day this past week, trying to talk again like nothing’s happened. So how do I address the obvious racism with someone who thinks she’s “the most accepting and multicultural person in our family” for one, and secondly, always makes herself out to be the victim when I disagree with her on anything?
However, when I mentioned that I was happy to see white people experience consequences when they used slurs such as the N-word, she said it was a “choice” to be offended by slurs like that, and how people needed to get over it. She even spelled it out. I was totally bewildered. We are both white women. I told her it was inappropriate and racist for her to write or say that word. She continued to use it, saying she should be able to because it was “just a word.” I went on to provide her with multiple sources about why it was offensive and racist. She then said how I was “looking for reasons to have contempt for her” and how she and “the family” have never understood why I’ve always hated her. This went on and on until I eventually stopped responding. However, she’s texted me every day this past week, trying to talk again like nothing’s happened. So how do I address the obvious racism with someone who thinks she’s “the most accepting and multicultural person in our family” for one, and secondly, always makes herself out to be the victim when I disagree with her on anything?
Help! My Aunt Says It’s a “Choice” to Be Offended by Racial Slurs.
NYC public school asks parents to ‘reflect’ on their ‘whiteness’
The curriculum, written by Barnor Hesse, an associate professor of African American studies at Northwestern University in Illinois, claims, “There is a regime of whiteness, and there are action-oriented white identities.
“People who identify with whiteness are one of these,’’ Hesse writes above the eight-point list.
“It’s about time we build an ethnography of whiteness, since white people have been the ones writing about and governing Others,’’ Hesse adds.
“People who identify with whiteness are one of these,’’ Hesse writes above the eight-point list.
“It’s about time we build an ethnography of whiteness, since white people have been the ones writing about and governing Others,’’ Hesse adds.
NYC public school asks parents to ‘reflect’ on their ‘whiteness’
Machines can do most of a psychologist’s job. The industry must prepare for disruption
Psychology and other “helping professions” such as counselling and social work are often regarded as quintessentially human domains. Unlike workers in manual or routine jobs, psychologists generally see no threat to their career from advances in machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Economists largely agree. One of the most wide-ranging and influential surveys of the future of employment, by Oxford economists Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne, rated the probability that psychology could be automated in the near future at a mere 0.43%. This work was initially carried out in 2013 and expanded upon in 2019.
We are behavourial scientists studying organisational behaviour, and one of us (Ben Morrison) is also a registered psychologist. Our analysis over the past four years shows the idea psychology cannot be automated is now out of date.
Psychology already makes use of many automated tools, and even without significant advances in AI we foresee significant impacts in the very near future.
Economists largely agree. One of the most wide-ranging and influential surveys of the future of employment, by Oxford economists Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne, rated the probability that psychology could be automated in the near future at a mere 0.43%. This work was initially carried out in 2013 and expanded upon in 2019.
We are behavourial scientists studying organisational behaviour, and one of us (Ben Morrison) is also a registered psychologist. Our analysis over the past four years shows the idea psychology cannot be automated is now out of date.
Psychology already makes use of many automated tools, and even without significant advances in AI we foresee significant impacts in the very near future.
Machines can do most of a psychologist’s job. The industry must prepare for disruption
Rachel Lindsay Slams Bachelor Franchise, Host Chris Harrison: 'I Can't Take It Anymore' 
Rachel Lindsay has publicly called out Chris Harrison, two days after the longtime Bachelor host apologized for perpetuating racism within the franchise.
During Thursday's episode of the Higher Learning with Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay podcast, Lindsay — who became the first Black Bachelorette in 2017 — spoke out against Harrison after he seemingly defended current contestant Rachael Kirkconnell amid backlash over her past racist behavior. Harrison made the remarks in question during a 14-minute, unedited interview with Lindsay on Extra this week.
"I can't take it anymore," Lindsay, 35, said of her future with the show. "I'm contractually bound in some ways, but when it's up, I am, too. I can't. I can't do it anymore."
During Thursday's episode of the Higher Learning with Van Lathan and Rachel Lindsay podcast, Lindsay — who became the first Black Bachelorette in 2017 — spoke out against Harrison after he seemingly defended current contestant Rachael Kirkconnell amid backlash over her past racist behavior. Harrison made the remarks in question during a 14-minute, unedited interview with Lindsay on Extra this week.
"I can't take it anymore," Lindsay, 35, said of her future with the show. "I'm contractually bound in some ways, but when it's up, I am, too. I can't. I can't do it anymore."
Rachel Lindsay Slams Bachelor Franchise, Host Chris Harrison: 'I Can't Take It Anymore'
Chris Harrison Steps Away From 'The Bachelor' After Controversial Interview
Shelley Duvall On Dr. Phil: I Found Out The ‘Hard Way’ What Kind Of Person He Is
Shelly Duvall is the subject of an unexpected — yet lovingly written — profile in The Hollywood Reporter on Thursday.
The reclusive co-star of the 1980 film “The Shining” — who fled from Hollywood to Texas for unknown reasons nearly 30 years ago — had made only one TV appearance after fading into obscurity.
In 2016, she was a guest on “Dr. Phil” in an interview widely panned for being exploitative of someone with a mental health condition. Most famously, Duvall told host Phil McGraw that she believed that Robin Williams, her co-star in the 1980 film “Popeye” who died by suicide in 2014, was still alive and was a shapeshifter.
The reclusive co-star of the 1980 film “The Shining” — who fled from Hollywood to Texas for unknown reasons nearly 30 years ago — had made only one TV appearance after fading into obscurity.
In 2016, she was a guest on “Dr. Phil” in an interview widely panned for being exploitative of someone with a mental health condition. Most famously, Duvall told host Phil McGraw that she believed that Robin Williams, her co-star in the 1980 film “Popeye” who died by suicide in 2014, was still alive and was a shapeshifter.
Shelley Duvall On Dr. Phil: I Found Out The ‘Hard Way’ What Kind Of Person He Is
Britney Spears Conservatorship Case Heads Back to Court
The legal battle over who should control Britney Spears’s finances and personal life is scheduled to return to the courtroom later this week amid a renewed discussion of how she was treated during her meteoric rise as a teenage pop star and during her subsequent mental health struggles.
What has become clear in recent months through her lawyer, according to court filings, is that Britney Spears no longer wants her father to serve as her conservator.
At a court hearing in November, the singer’s lawyer said that “she is afraid of her father,” whom she has not spoken to in a long time, and that she will not perform again if her father maintains control over her career, The Associated Press reported.
What has become clear in recent months through her lawyer, according to court filings, is that Britney Spears no longer wants her father to serve as her conservator.
At a court hearing in November, the singer’s lawyer said that “she is afraid of her father,” whom she has not spoken to in a long time, and that she will not perform again if her father maintains control over her career, The Associated Press reported.
Britney Spears Conservatorship Case Heads Back to Court
Allegations against TI and Tiny prompt call to support Black sexual assault survivors
The scandal involving the rapper and former girl group member erupted over several weeks as women reportedly came forward to accuse the power couple of confiscating their cellphones and preventing from leaving as the Harrises sexual assaulted them, or other women, in forced drug binges.
It has prompted the activists to address the issue as showing how Black survivors are often sidelined and their stories ignored in the national MeToo reckoning in America over sexual assault.
“We know countless of you have come forward with credible accusations of horrific sexual abuse and violence at the hands of Black celebrities,” the activists and groups wrote in a public letter. “Like you, we are carrying the emotional weight of this news and know that we are reliving a collective trauma akin to the exposing of Cosby and R Kelly.”
It has prompted the activists to address the issue as showing how Black survivors are often sidelined and their stories ignored in the national MeToo reckoning in America over sexual assault.
“We know countless of you have come forward with credible accusations of horrific sexual abuse and violence at the hands of Black celebrities,” the activists and groups wrote in a public letter. “Like you, we are carrying the emotional weight of this news and know that we are reliving a collective trauma akin to the exposing of Cosby and R Kelly.”
Allegations against TI and Tiny prompt call to support Black sexual assault survivors
Former ‘Doctors’ co-host calls out ‘toxic’ conditions at show
Racism allegations have rocked “The Doctors.” Insiders and a former host tell Page Six the environment at the syndicated daytime talk show has been so hostile, it makes working at “Ellen” look like a walk in the park.”
“The whole culture is toxic. The executive producer [Patricia Ciano] constantly yells at people. She even cussed me out once. There was also always something about my hair. They were constantly making comments, and harassing me about my hair,” Dr. Rachael Ross, who co-hosted the show for three seasons, told us.
“And diversity on screen was not encouraged unless there was a weight loss story,” she added.
Multiple sources claim she often shot down pitches involving African Americans and would berate producers for pitching non-white experts.
“The whole culture is toxic. The executive producer [Patricia Ciano] constantly yells at people. She even cussed me out once. There was also always something about my hair. They were constantly making comments, and harassing me about my hair,” Dr. Rachael Ross, who co-hosted the show for three seasons, told us.
“And diversity on screen was not encouraged unless there was a weight loss story,” she added.
Multiple sources claim she often shot down pitches involving African Americans and would berate producers for pitching non-white experts.
Former ‘Doctors’ co-host calls out ‘toxic’ conditions at show
Law used to prosecute Capitol riot, Black Lives Matter violence under fire as racist 
The law in question was enacted in 1968. It prohibited interference with police or firefighters during group violence, amid devastating riots in Washington D.C. and across the country that followed the assassination of Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. in April of that year.
Southern senators hastily passed the measure as a way to counter civil rights laws by getting tough on African Americans accused of attacking law enforcement.
Now, attorneys are pointing to that history to question its current application. A series of motions attacking the law have been filed in recent weeks in at least five different criminal cases, which have garnered the attention of top officials at the Justice Department in Washington.
The motions note that the ‘68 law was championed by Sen. Russell Long (D-La.) and that he formally titled it “the Civil Obedience Act,” in a snarky swipe at civil disobedience advocates like King.
The powerful and avowedly segregationist senator said missives like King’s famous letter from a Birmingham jail caused “the ultimate in lawlessness, wanton killing, and senseless, destructive rioting.”
“Because Senator Long believed that criticism of white supremacy and demands for racial justice were bound to cause riots, he proposed the Civil Obedience Act as a tool to suppress such expression,” the newly filed motions argue. “The legislative history … shows that it was enacted to suppress messages in support of civil rights and racial justice for Black Americans.”
Southern senators hastily passed the measure as a way to counter civil rights laws by getting tough on African Americans accused of attacking law enforcement.
Now, attorneys are pointing to that history to question its current application. A series of motions attacking the law have been filed in recent weeks in at least five different criminal cases, which have garnered the attention of top officials at the Justice Department in Washington.
The motions note that the ‘68 law was championed by Sen. Russell Long (D-La.) and that he formally titled it “the Civil Obedience Act,” in a snarky swipe at civil disobedience advocates like King.
The powerful and avowedly segregationist senator said missives like King’s famous letter from a Birmingham jail caused “the ultimate in lawlessness, wanton killing, and senseless, destructive rioting.”
“Because Senator Long believed that criticism of white supremacy and demands for racial justice were bound to cause riots, he proposed the Civil Obedience Act as a tool to suppress such expression,” the newly filed motions argue. “The legislative history … shows that it was enacted to suppress messages in support of civil rights and racial justice for Black Americans.”
Law used to prosecute Capitol riot, Black Lives Matter violence under fire as racist
Outcry after Indian court rules groping without removing clothes is not sexual assault 
The Supreme Court of India on Wednesday stayed a controversial judgment by another court which held that groping of a minor without “skin-to-skin” contact and without removing clothes is not “sexual assault”.
Attorney general KK Venugopal called the judgment by the Bombay High Court “very disturbing” and sought to file a petition against the order.
The ruling in question was given on 19 January by Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala of the Bombay High Court, who acquitted a 39-year-old man previously found guilty of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl by groping her under Section 7 (sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO).
“The act of pressing of breast of the child aged 12 years, in the absence of any specific detail as to whether the top was removed or whether he inserted his hand inside top and pressed her breast, would not fall in the definition of ‘sexual assault’,” Ms Ganediwala said.
Attorney general KK Venugopal called the judgment by the Bombay High Court “very disturbing” and sought to file a petition against the order.
The ruling in question was given on 19 January by Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala of the Bombay High Court, who acquitted a 39-year-old man previously found guilty of sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl by groping her under Section 7 (sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO).
“The act of pressing of breast of the child aged 12 years, in the absence of any specific detail as to whether the top was removed or whether he inserted his hand inside top and pressed her breast, would not fall in the definition of ‘sexual assault’,” Ms Ganediwala said.
Outcry after Indian court rules groping without removing clothes is not sexual assault
Should I Apologize Again to My Cousin for Sleeping With Her Husband?
Four years ago, I had an affair with my cousin’s husband. The fallout was exactly what you’d imagine: godawful. I felt terrible about it at the time and apologized immediately. My cousin severed ties with me and most of my immediate family. Recently our grandmother died from COVID, and we were all together for the funeral. My cousin was perfectly polite, and I was reminded of my immense guilt that I hurt her and broke up her marriage. I would like to send a note apologizing for my part in the dissolution of her marriage but am not sure it’s a good idea. I also realize sometimes it’s better to let sleeping dogs lie and don’t want to bring up a painful memory for her unnecessarily. I would ask my parents, but I don’t want to open an old can of worms with them. We’ve moved on, but I know they feel pain at losing their niece at my hands. Any advice you can give would be appreciated.
—Family Fallout
—Family Fallout
Should I Apologize Again to My Cousin for Sleeping With Her Husband?
Steven Spielberg Reportedly Refusing To Work With Tom Cruise Again
Steven Spielberg is one of the greatest directors in the history of cinema, not to mention the single most commercially successful, with the bearded legend the only person to boast a filmography that’s earned over $10 billion at the box office. Meanwhile, Tom Cruise has been one of the Hollywood’s marquee stars for 35 years, so it was almost inevitable that any collaborations between the two would yield spectacular results.
Indeed, Minority Report is one of the 21st Century’s best sci-fi movies, while War of the Worlds was a massive hit that reinvented the classic story for the modern era, and it remains the biggest earner of Cruise’s career that isn’t part of the Mission: Impossible franchise. Having turned out two high quality crowd-pleasers in the space of just three years, then, it looked as though a fruitful partnership was in the works, but they haven’t worked together since.
Insider Daniel Richtman is now claiming that’s because Spielberg has no interest in reuniting with the action icon, despite Cruise reportedly looking to set up for another movie for them. Unfortunately, he doesn’t get into specifics, but notes that “[the director] doesn’t wanna work with Cruise.”
Indeed, Minority Report is one of the 21st Century’s best sci-fi movies, while War of the Worlds was a massive hit that reinvented the classic story for the modern era, and it remains the biggest earner of Cruise’s career that isn’t part of the Mission: Impossible franchise. Having turned out two high quality crowd-pleasers in the space of just three years, then, it looked as though a fruitful partnership was in the works, but they haven’t worked together since.
Insider Daniel Richtman is now claiming that’s because Spielberg has no interest in reuniting with the action icon, despite Cruise reportedly looking to set up for another movie for them. Unfortunately, he doesn’t get into specifics, but notes that “[the director] doesn’t wanna work with Cruise.”
Steven Spielberg Reportedly Refusing To Work With Tom Cruise Again
‘Married at First Sight’: Dr. Viviana Coles Calls Fans Nasty?
Dr. Viviana Coles of Married at First Sight was reading through some of the fan comments. And she said that she couldn’t hold her tongue anymore. Viviana went on to say that “these are real people” and that people should just wish them well and watch their journey.
MAFS viewers went on to say that the production of the show has a big part to play in what people say. And that half of the time, what they make it look like isn’t even true. One even said that they don’t see why they matched a young party girl with an older mature man.
After Dr. Viviana Coles said this, fans went at each other’s throats. But most people were against some of the less than perfect matches the experts made since adding two more couples. Married at First Sight viewers said they get that not everyone will work out but that some of the matches are terrible.
MAFS viewers went on to say that the production of the show has a big part to play in what people say. And that half of the time, what they make it look like isn’t even true. One even said that they don’t see why they matched a young party girl with an older mature man.
After Dr. Viviana Coles said this, fans went at each other’s throats. But most people were against some of the less than perfect matches the experts made since adding two more couples. Married at First Sight viewers said they get that not everyone will work out but that some of the matches are terrible.
‘Married at First Sight’: Dr. Viviana Coles Calls Fans Nasty?
Men Find Bromances 'Emotionally Rival' Romantic Relationships, Study Reveals
Men find that platonic friendships with other men 'emotionally rival' their romantic relationships with women, according to a study in Men and Masculinities.
Those surveyed said 'the lack of boundaries and judgment' in their friendships with other men resulted in 'elevated emotional stability, enhanced emotional disclosure, social fulfilment, and better conflict resolution, compared to the emotional lives they shared with girlfriends'.
Most of the participants answers to the survey also made reference to the fact they felt more like they could be their real self with their bros.
As one respondent said: "Tim knows I love listening to Taylor Swift and Beyoncé, but I keep that quiet [around my girlfriend] because she would judge me. I feel like I have to be more manly around her."
Those surveyed said 'the lack of boundaries and judgment' in their friendships with other men resulted in 'elevated emotional stability, enhanced emotional disclosure, social fulfilment, and better conflict resolution, compared to the emotional lives they shared with girlfriends'.
Most of the participants answers to the survey also made reference to the fact they felt more like they could be their real self with their bros.
As one respondent said: "Tim knows I love listening to Taylor Swift and Beyoncé, but I keep that quiet [around my girlfriend] because she would judge me. I feel like I have to be more manly around her."
Men Find Bromances 'Emotionally Rival' Romantic Relationships, Study Reveals
